'It embarrasses me to be involved': Inside the National Guard D.C. deployment

As President Trump's deployment of the National Guard to Washington, D.C. enters its second year, three guard members who served many months on the mission share their reactions with NPR. (Image credit: Illustration by Mari Fouz for NPR)
Thousands of National Guard members have been patrolling the streets of Washington, D.C., for more than a year, in what has become President Trump's largest and longest domestic military deployment. Illustration by Mari Fouz for NPR hide caption
As the sight of armed, uniformed National Guard troops became ubiquitous in Washington, D.C., over the past year, one voice has been notably absent from the public discourse around the deployment: the guard members themselves.
"I will say very frankly that the bad taste that this mission left in my mouth, it actually embarrasses me to be involved in any way," one guard member who was part of the deployment for several months recently told NPR.
Members of the military are not allowed to speak to the press without authorization. Under this administration, those rules and the ramifications for breaking them have gotten even stricter.
National Guard deployments
Armed troops have patrolled D.C. for 1 year now. It's challenging democratic norms
But some members who are no longer a part of the mission have become more open to sharing their thoughts as the deployment enters its second year — and has been extended to the end of President Trump's term.
"I don't want to think about the National Guard. I don't want to necessarily discuss my affiliation with the National Guard. I don't want to fulfill my normal National Guard duties just because of the abuses of the National Guard in this D.C. mission," the guard member said, noting that isn't how he's felt after previous domestic deployments.
That guard member was one of three who spoke to NPR on the condition of anonymity because they are still serving and are barred from speaking publicly. All of them were deployed as part of the D.C. Safe and Beautiful mission for many months, and each has more than a decade of service.
In candid interviews, the guard members described their feelings throughout their time on the deployment, and their worries about the new norms it's establishing. They discussed the cost, which is expected to run into the billions. And they say they worry that Trump's unprecedented use of the troops is damaging the National Guard's reputation with the American public.
All were skeptical about the administration's original reason for the deployment — to help with law enforcement after declaring a "crime emergency" , despite a 30-year low in violent crime in the city.
"Now, with it being a year, it's hard to feel like that justification holds any water," said one guard member. "It feels like the guard is being exploited in a sense."
Another said it feels more like a political stunt, pointing out the way the guard has been inserted into certain narratives by the administration, like being ordered to patrol the perimeter of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool following its faulty renovation.
Members of the Army National Guard congregate near the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool on July 2 in Washington, D.C. Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images hide caption
"I hope that there will be some accounting someday — probably after President Trump is gone — about why we were there, and was it worth it? But none of that is gonna happen right now," that member said.
NPR reached out to both the White House and the D.C. Joint Task Force regarding the concerns raised by the guard members.
The White House responded by reiterating how safe D.C. is now, without providing evidence that the guard is responsible for decreasing crime.
In a statement, Brig. Gen. Leland Blanchard II, the interim commanding general of the D.C. National Guard, called the deployment "unique" and pointed to "significant accomplishments" that guard members contributed in the past year, including assisting law enforcement with apprehensions, rendering medical aid and reuniting lost children with their families.
"Whatever individual perspectives they carry away from their experience, their service and sacrifice deserve our respect," Blanchard wrote.
"My initial reaction was just shock"
Law
Amid intense backlash, people are vandalizing Flock surveillance cameras
Trump first deployed the D.C. National Guard in August of 2025 — something he can do since the president controls the district's guard. Hundreds of guard members in the district were pulled from their civilian jobs and immediately called up.
"My very initial reaction was just, I guess, shock and feeling like this context and this situation just felt like a very authoritarian move that kind of felt uncharacteristic of something you would see in our country," said one member of the D.C. guard, adding that the reasoning behind the deployment contributed to the confusion.
In the days and weeks that followed, Republican governors began sending members of their guard to help with the mission.
"Walking into it, we had no real specifics," one guard member who was deployed from West Virginia remembered thinking. "The president is calling out the guard to make D.C. safe. Well, what the what the f*** does that mean?"
All remembered a scramble in the early days to figure out what everyone should be doing, as more and more troops — who were all deputized as special law enforcement and armed with a handgun — arrived. They said that despite the confusion, there was a collective effort to figure out how to be useful and effective. Military members are trained to be apolitical and follow orders.
National Guard deployments
A veteran was detained by the National Guard in her front yard. Now she's suing
"All of these people showed up, and then it was more of an after-the-fact figure out what we're going to do," one said, saying everyone was really trying to be as helpful as possible to the community with whatever resources they were given, like providing Naloxone to counter the effects of an opioid overdose or helping a bicyclist who had been hit by a car. "We can argue about why they were there and whether they should be there, but soldiers and airmen were trying to do the best with what they had."
In the early days, troops were largely assigned to help with beautification projects around the city: clearing trash along the road, bagging leaves in public parks or trimming trees at the National Mall. The guard member from West Virginia said that many of the members he had arrived with — most of whom had raised their hand for the deployment — became quickly disillusioned.
Air National Guard airmen work clearing leaves and debris from McPherson Square Park on Aug. 28, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Andrew Leyden/Getty Images hide caption
"I know there were a lot of people that showed up from West Virginia specifically that were just like, I want to help, and then later they found out that they were taking out trash and setting up (logistical equipment). I think they later fell off mission as soon as they could get off," he said.
Patrolling the streets
As the deployment continued, troops were assigned less to beautification projects and more to presence patrols around the city — which the task force says are an effort to deter crime — and settled into a routine that one guard member described as "mundane" and another as "monotonous."
"At some point, I found myself going, well, at least this isn't that bad. At least I'm not doing anything illegal, and that's always counterbalanced with, like, this is wasting everyone's time," one said, adding that it became clear that the "point of the mission is presence."
One member who served in Afghanistan likened the patrols to tactics commonly used by the U.S. military during the War on Terror in communities to instill goodwill and monitor the opposition.
National Guard troops stand next to a military Humvee at The Park at LeDroit in Northwest D.C. on Aug. 12. Andrew Harnik/Getty Images hide caption
Another said the lack of clear goals made the deployment feel never-ending, even as Trump falsely claimed there was "almost zero crime" in D.C. and touted its success.
"If it's safe now, then why are we here?" one guard member asked. "You don't really know when good is good enough, or when we can go home. It's just a continuing thing."
Two recent studies have found that the National Guard presence has had no effect on violent crime in the city, while it has minimally decreased more opportunistic crime, like petty theft and vehicle break-ins. Both also found that local policing could produce better outcomes for less money.
The deployment comes with perks
A majority of the nearly 4,700 guard members deployed to D.C. are from other states or U.S. territories, most of which are led by Republicans, and have volunteered for the assignment. All three guard members said that despite their concerns, they understood why people might raise their hand.
"It's a good paycheck, and I can't blame them for wanting to better their own financial situation when the economy is how it is right now," one said, noting that many of the troops are very young, come from more rural communities and might not have steady income back home.
There are a host of other incentives as well, from per diems to boosts to their retirement benefits.
National Guard deployments
In Memphis, an 'anti-crime' task force quietly turned into an ICE crackdown
The guard member from West Virginia said that normally, on domestic deployments, he was used to sleeping on the floor of an armory, maybe without electricity, and eating ready-to-eat military meals. But this D.C. deployment was much more comfortable.
"The food on the mission was very good. My hotel was very nice," he said, noting that was different even from other times he had come to D.C. on deployment for events like the inauguration.
The thousands of out-of-state guard members have been staying in hotels throughout the city for more than a year. Recently, the federal government awarded a nearly $300 million contract — the largest of its kind ever — to a local company for thousands of furnished, luxury apartments, saying the move would ultimately save money on extended lodging for the troops in D.C.
Coverage from 2 sources
Coverage by lean
- Unknown2
Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
Sign in with SpryLogin